In corporations, investment lives under the shadow of consequences: miss the return, and losses, cuts, or exits follow. In child welfare, particularly across Western systems, funding is intentionally steady to protect equity, which means poor implementation rarely triggers immediate organizational consequences. That stability is ethically essential, yet it can dull investment discipline. We invest in promising programs and platforms but underinvest in the unglamorous scaffold

“Start with the end in mind” is the name of Stephen R. Covey’s Habit 2, which urges individuals and organisations to establish the destination first and then make decisions and shape routines to get there (Covey, 1989/2013). In child welfare, the “end” is easy to articulate but hard to deliver on: children who are safeguarded, well looked after, and thriving. SgT uses the end-in-mind discipline of working backward so leadership decisions, supervision, and day-to-day practice

Child welfare can be positively transformed when organizations reframe their view of families from passive recipients of statutory intervention to valued customers (service users) of a public service, whose experience, trust, and participation are decisive to children’s safety, well-being, and stability. ATA Consultancy advances this reframing by adapting well-established service user experience, quality improvement, and change management principles from the corporate world t

ATA Consultancy strongly believes that the foundation of a robust child protection investigation (and safeguarding for children and families) is laid in the first phase of the work. The questions asked, the position the worker takes with the family, and the way information is captured either set in place a model of disciplined, balanced information-gathering or take the case down a path of subjectivity and paternalism that is difficult to reset.   Safeguarding Together starts