A Customer-Centred Revolution in Child Welfare: How ATA Consultancy Translates Proven Service Principles into Better Outcomes

Child welfare can be positively transformed when organizations reframe their view of families from passive recipients of statutory intervention to valued customers (service users) of a public service, whose experience, trust, and participation are decisive to children’s safety, well-being, and stability.

ATA Consultancy advances this reframing by adapting well-established service user experience, quality improvement, and change management principles from the corporate world to the ethical, trauma-aware context of child and family services. The core argument is straightforward: when systems shift from paternalistic practices to providing excellent service, defined by feedback, responsiveness, reliability, and shared decision-making, practice quality improves, trust grows, outcomes strengthen, and children, families and networks gain resilience, ability and capacity to ensure sustained safety and well-being. This claim is consistent with research on co-creation of value in services (Vargo & Lusch, 2004), experience-based co-design (Bate & Robert, 2006), quality management (Deming, 1986; Womack & Jones, 1996), and customer experience (Meyer & Schwager, 2007), as well as applied change frameworks that enable sustainable adoption (Hiatt, 2006; Kotter, 1996).

Central to ATA’s approach is the view that effective and sustainable safeguarding is co-produced, with the input of all stakeholders through reflection and feedback. Service-Dominant Logic posits that firms do not create value; they co-create value-in-use propositions (i.e., the ability of an offering to enable value to be realized in a use context) through collaboration with consumers (Vargo & Lusch, 2004). Applied to child welfare, this means that the family, children, and the family’s network must collaborate to co-produce safeguarding conditions with practitioners supporting them, rather than the traditional paternalistic imposed approaches. 

Corporate customer-experience systems combine transactional feedback and relational feedback to identify issues early and restore service before trust erodes (Meyer & Schwager, 2007). ATA adapts these mechanisms into a Voice-of-Family system: short, safe surveys following major touchpoints, monthly pulses during involvement, and an end-of-journey review. A concise “Net Trust & Helpfulness Score,” adapted from the Net Promoter concept, supplies a leading indicator of confidence that leaders can discuss daily (Reichheld, 2003). Quantitative signals are paired with qualitative comments that trigger same-day service recovery, not future audits. The point is not to “satisfy” families in a consumerist sense, but to track, in real time, the trust, clarity, and partnership necessary for rigorous analysis and sustained safeguarding.

Child welfare services are subject to distinct risks of re-traumatization, equity gaps, and coercive dynamics. A service user-centred model must be rooted in trauma-informed and relational practice. Trauma-informed care centers prioritize safety, predictability, choice, collaboration, and empowerment as prerequisites for engagement (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMHSA], 2014). Motivational Interviewing builds on these principles with specific skills, empathy, evocation, and autonomy support that are respectful of family agency while supporting movement toward change (Miller & Rollnick, 2013). Integrated into regular work and supervision, these approaches minimize resistance, increase the disclosure of relevant information, and expedite the co-design of practical and testable plans. In short, excellent service is not leniency; it is disciplined, transparent, and humane work that improves the quality of decisions and follow-through.

There are predictable concerns about the use of “customer service” language in statutory contexts. Some worry it signals leniency. The research base and operational logic rebut this: quality service is about reliability, fairness, and decisional clarity, the very conditions that increase safety and reduce drift (Deming, 1986; Womack & Jones, 1996). When organizations adopt this service user-centred operating model, signature improvements follow. Families report higher trust and greater clarity about expectations and next steps; plans become more behavioural and network-anchored; supervision shifts from retrospective compliance to prospective coaching; and leaders can “see the work” and remove obstacles quickly. Over time, agencies experience fewer re-referrals, more stable children, and staff who feel competent and proud of the service they deliver. These outcomes parallel those of other industries that formalized customer experience, quality management and disciplined change practices. (Meyer & Schwager, 2007; George, 2003; Hiatt, 2006).

In conclusion, the path to enhancing child welfare experiences lies in working in collaboration with families and their networks, soliciting regular feedback, and continually striving to improve the service user experience.  By translating and tailoring proven corporate service disciplines, co-design, standard work, continuous feedback, concise metrics, and structured change, ATA Consultancy offers a practical, evidence-informed way to move from working at families to working with them. This is not a façade of politeness; it is an operating system for decisive, humane, and reliable safeguarding, one capable of revolutionising how the field works and the outcomes it achieves (Bate & Robert, 2006; Deming, 1986; Hiatt, 2006; Kotter, 1996; Meyer & Schwager, 2007; Vargo & Lusch, 2004; Womack & Jones, 1996).

References

Bate, P., & Robert, G. (2006). Experience-based design: From redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 15(5), 307–310. 

Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.

Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.

Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute.

George, M. (2003). Lean Six Sigma for service. McGraw-Hill.

Hiatt, J. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government and our community. Prosci.

Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.

Meyer, C., & Schwager, A. (2007). Understanding customer experience. Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 117–126.

Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 46–54.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2014). SAMHSA’s concept of trauma and guidance for a trauma-informed approach (HHS Publication No. SMA 14-4884).

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17. 

Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking. Simon & Schuster.

In-text citation ordering examples (alphabetical): (Bate & Robert, 2006; Deming, 1986; Hiatt, 2006; Kotter, 1996; Meyer & Schwager, 2007; Vargo & Lusch, 2004; Womack & Jones, 1996).